Heart Failure Management through Telehealth: Expanding Care and Connecting Hearts.

Heart failure (HF) is a leading cause of morbidity worldwide, imposing a significant burden on deaths, hospitalizations, and health costs. Anticipating patients' deterioration is a cornerstone of HF treatment: preventing congestion and end organ damage while titrating HF therapies is the aim of the majority of clinical trials. Anyway, real-life medicine struggles with resource optimization, often reducing the chances of providing a patient-tailored follow-up. Telehealth holds the potential to drive substantial qualitative improvement in clinical practice through the development of patient-centered care, facilitating resource optimization, leading to decreased outpatient visits, hospitalizations, and lengths of hospital stays. Different technologies are rising to offer the best possible care to many subsets of patients, facing any stage of HF, and challenging extreme scenarios such as heart transplantation and ventricular assist devices. This article aims to thoroughly examine the potential advantages and obstacles presented by both existing and emerging telehealth technologies, including artificial intelligence.

[The IN-HF Registry: the history and the scientific production for the Italian cardiology community]. / Il programma IN-HF: la storia e la produzione scientifica a favore della comunità cardiologica italiana.

The Italian Network on Congestive Heart Failure (IN-CHF) project, later known as IN-HF Online, was launched in 1995 to provide the Italian cardiology community with a digital tool, standardized across the country, for managing outpatients with heart failure (HF), that enabled the creation of a database for clinical, educational and scientific purposes. During its almost three decades of activity, this observational research program has achieved highly positive scientific results. Indeed, IN-HF fostered professional relationships among individuals working in different centers, established a cultural network for the care of HF patients, periodically updated on the scientific advances, and allowed the assessment of several clinical, epidemiological, and prognostic features. These findings have been published in numerous national and international journals, as summarized in the present overview.

Frequency, characteristics and risk assessment of pulmonary arterial hypertension with a left heart disease phenotype.

AIM: To obtain real-world evidence about the features and risk stratification of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) with a left heart disease (LHD) phenotype (PAH-LHD). METHODS AND RESULTS: By reviewing the records of consecutive incident PAH patients at 7 tertiary centers from 2001 to 2021, we selected 286 subjects with all parameters needed to determine risk of death at baseline and at first follow-up with COMPERA and COMPERA 2.0 scores. Fifty seven (20%) had PAH-LHD according to the AMBITION definition. Compared with no-LHD ones, they were older, had higher BMI, more cardiovascular comorbidities, higher E/e' ratio and left atrial area, but lower BNP concentrations and better right ventricular function and pulmonary hemodynamics. Survival was comparable between PAH-LHD and no-LHD patients, although the former were less commonly treated with dual PAH therapy. Both COMPERA and COMPERA 2.0 discriminated all-cause mortality risk of PAH-LHD at follow-up, but not at baseline. Risk profile significantly improved during follow-up only when assessed by COMPERA 2.0. At multivariable analysis with low-risk status as reference, intermediate-high and high-risk, but not LHD phenotype, were associated with higher hazard of all-cause mortality. Results were comparable in secondary analyses including patients in the last 10 years and atrial fibrillation and echocardiographic abnormalities as additional criteria for PAH-LHD. CONCLUSIONS: In real life, PAH-LHD patients are frequent, have less severe disease and are less likely treated with PAH drug combinations than no-LHD. The COMPERA 2.0 model may be more appropriate to evaluate their mortality risk during follow-up and how it is modulated by therapy.

Clinical characteristics, treatment, trajectories and outcome of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy in a national heart failure registry.

BACKGROUND: Available data on the clinical characteristics and prognosis of patients with heart failure (HF) due to dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) derive mainly from tertiary care centres for cardiomyopathies or from drug trial sub-studies, which may entail a referral bias. METHODS: From 2008 to 2021, we enrolled in a nationwide HF Registry 1886 DCM patients and 3899 with ischemic heart disease (IHD). RESULTS: Patients with DCM were younger, more often female, had more commonly recent onset HF, left bundle branch block, and showed higher LV end-diastolic volume and lower LVEF than IHD. With respect to IHD, DCM patients received more often mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, renin angiotensin system inhibitors and betablockers, the latter more commonly at doses ≥50% of target, and triple guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) (adjusted OR 1.411, 95% CI 1.247-1.595, p < .0001). During one-year follow-up, 819 patients (14.2%) died or were hospitalized for HF [187 (9.9%) DCM, 632 (16.2%) IHD]; DCM was associated with lower risk of the combined end-point (adjusted HR 0.745, 95% CI 0.625- 0.888, p = .0011). Among the 1954 patients with 1-year echocardiograms available, 1483 had LVEF≤40% at baseline; of these,166 (30.6%) DCM and 165 (17.5%) IHD improved their LVEF to >40% (p < .0001). DCM aetiology was associated with higher likelihood of LVEF improvement (adjusted OR 1.722, 95% CI 1.328 -2.233, p < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: DCM patients have a different clinical profile, greater uptake of GDMT and better outcomes than IHD subjects. A comprehensive management approach is needed to further address the risk of unfavorable outcomes in DCM.

Estimation of Right Atrial Pressure by Ultrasound-Assessed Jugular Vein Distensibility in Patients With Heart Failure.

BACKGROUND: Clinical evaluation of central venous pressure is difficult, depends on experience, and is often inaccurate in patients with chronic advanced heart failure. We assessed the ultrasound-assessed internal jugular vein (JV) distensibility by ultrasound as a noninvasive tool to identify patients with normal right atrial pressure (RAP ≤7 mm Hg) in this population. METHODS: We measured JV distensibility as the Valsalva-to-rest ratio of the vein diameter in a calibration cohort (N=100) and a validation cohort (N=101) of consecutive patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction who underwent pulmonary artery catheterization for advanced heart failure therapies workup. RESULTS: A JV distensibility threshold of 1.6 was identified as the most accurate to discriminate between patients with RAP ≤7 versus >7 mm Hg (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.64-0.84]) and confirmed in the validation cohort (receiver operating characteristic, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.73-0.92]). A JV distensibility ratio >1.6 had predictive positive values of 0.86 and 0.94, respectively, to identify patients with RAP ≤7 mm Hg in the calibration and validation cohorts. Compared with patients from the calibration cohort with a high JV distensibility ratio (>1.6; n=42; median RAP, 4 mm Hg; pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, 11 mm Hg), those with a low JV distensibility ratio (≤1.6; n=58; median RAP, 8 mm Hg; pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, 22 mm Hg; P<0.0001 for both) were more likely to die or undergo a left ventricular assist device implant or heart transplantation (event rate at 2 years: 42.7% versus 18.2%; log-rank P=0.034). CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-assessed JV distensibility identifies patients with chronic advanced heart failure with normal RAP and better outcomes. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03874312.

Current treatment and immunomodulation strategies in Acute Myocarditis.

Myocarditis is an inflammatory disease of the myocardium characterized by a great heterogeneity of presentation and evolution. Treatment of myocarditis is often supportive and the evidence for immunosuppression is scarce and debated. Conventional treatment is based on clinical presentation, ranging from conservative to advanced mechanical assist devices. In this setting, immunosuppression and immunomodulation therapies are mostly reserved for patients presenting with major clinical syndromes. In this review, we will summarise the current evidence and strategies for conventional and immunosuppressive treatments for patients presenting with acute myocarditis.

[Pulmonary hypertension associated with left heart diseases: pathophysiology, diagnosis, treatment]. / Ipertensione polmonare associata ad insufficienza cardiaca: fisiopatologia, diagnosi, terapia.

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a common complication of diseases affecting the left heart, mostly found in patients suffering from heart failure. Left atrial hypertension is the initial driver of post-capillary PH. However, several mechanisms may lead in a subset of patients to structural changes in the pulmonary vessels with development of a pre-capillary component. The right ventricle may be frequently affected, leading to right ventricular failure and a worse outcome. The differential diagnosis of PH associated with left heart disease vs pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is challenging in patients with cardiovascular comorbidities, risk factors for PAH and/or a preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Multidimensional clinical phenotyping is needed to identify patients in whom hemodynamic confirmation is deemed necessary, that may be completed by provocative testing in the cath lab. In contrast with PAH, management of PH associated with left heart disease should focus on the treatment of the underlying condition. There is currently no approved therapy for PH associated with left heart disease: some PAH-specific treatments have led to an increase in adverse events in these patients.

Biomarkers in Acute Myocarditis and Chronic Inflammatory Cardiomyopathy: An Updated Review of the Literature.

Myocarditis is a disease caused by cardiac inflammation that can progress to dilated cardiomyopathy, heart failure, and eventually death. Several etiologies, including autoimmune, drug-induced, and infectious, lead to inflammation, which causes damage to the myocardium, followed by remodeling and fibrosis. Although there has been an increasing understanding of pathophysiology, early and accurate diagnosis, and effective treatment remain challenging due to the high heterogeneity. As a result, many patients have poor prognosis, with those surviving at risk of long-term sequelae. Current diagnostic methods, including imaging and endomyocardial biopsy, are, at times, expensive, invasive, and not always performed early enough to affect disease progression. Therefore, the identification of accurate, cost-effective, and prognostically informative biomarkers is critical for screening and treatment. The review then focuses on the biomarkers currently associated with these conditions, which have been extensively studied via blood tests and imaging techniques. The information within this review was retrieved through extensive literature research conducted on major publicly accessible databases and has been collated and revised by an international panel of experts. The biomarkers discussed in the article have shown great promise in clinical research studies and provide clinicians with essential tools for early diagnosis and improved outcomes.

Intravenous continuous home inotropic therapy in advanced heart failure: Insights from an observational retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Intravenous inotropic support represents an important therapeutic option in advanced heart failure (HF) as bridge to heart transplantation, bridge to mechanical circulatory support, bridge to candidacy or as palliative therapy. Nevertheless, evidence regarding risks and benefits of its use is lacking. METHODS: we conducted a retrospective single center study, analysing the effect of inotropic therapies in an outpatient cohort, evaluating the burden of hospitalizations, the improvement in quality of life, the incidence of adverse events and the evolution of organ damage. RESULTS: twenty-seven patients with advanced HF were treated in our Day Hospital service from 2014 to 2021. Nine patients were treated as bridge to heart transplant while eighteen as palliation. Comparing data regarding the year before and after the beginning of inotropic infusion, we observed a reduction of hospitalization (46 vs 25, p<0,001), an improvement of natriuretic peptides, renal and hepatic function since the first month (p<0,001) and a better quality of life in 53% of the population treated. Two hospitalizations for arrhythmias and seven hospitalizations for catheter-related complications were registered. CONCLUSIONS: in a selected population of advanced HF patients, continuous home inotropic infusion were able to reduce hospitalizations, improving end organ damage and quality of life. We provide a practical guidance on starting and maintaining home inotropic infusion while monitoring a challenging group of patients.

Pheochromocytoma-induced cardiogenic shock: A multicentre analysis of clinical profiles, management and outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: There is still uncertainty about the management of patients with pheochromocytoma-induced cardiogenic shock (PICS). This study aims to investigate the clinical presentation, management, and outcome of patients with PICS. METHODS: We collected, retrospectively, the data of 18 patients without previously known pheochromocytoma admitted to 8 European hospitals with a diagnosis of PICS. RESULTS: Among the 18 patients with a median age of 50 years (Q1-Q3: 40-61), 50% were men. The main clinical features at presentation were pulmonary congestion (83%) and cyclic fluctuation of hypertension peaks and hypotension (72%). Echocardiography showed a median left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 25% (Q1-Q3: 15-33.5) with an atypical- Takotsubo (TTS) pattern in 50%. Inotropes/vasopressors were started in all patients and temporary mechanical circulatory support (t-MCS) was required in 11 (61%) patients. All patients underwent surgical removal of the pheochromocytoma; 4 patients (22%) were operated on while under t-MCS. The median LVEF was estimated at 55% at discharge. Only one patient required heart transplantation (5.5%), and all patients were alive at a median follow-up of 679 days. CONCLUSIONS: PICS should be suspected in case of a CS with severe cyclic blood pressure fluctuation and rapid hemodynamic deterioration, associated with increased inflammatory markers or in case of TTS progressing to CS, particularly if an atypical TTS echocardiographic pattern is revealed. T-MCS should be considered in the most severe cases. The main challenge is to stabilize the patient, with medical therapy or with t-MCS, since it remains a reversible cause of CS with a low mortality rate.

Advanced heart failure: from definitions to therapeutic options.

Advanced heart failure (AHF) represents an ominous stage of heart failure (HF), where the expected prognosis remains poor regardless of the improvement in medical knowledge. In this review, we summarize the definition, prognosis, physiopathology, and clinical/therapeutic management of the disease, focusing on the fast and timely referral of the patient to the AHF facilities. We provide an insight of the diagnostic and therapeutic 'work up' performed in an Italian AHF hub, implying a deep phenotypical patients characterization in order to evaluate candidacy to the therapeutic gold standards as heart transplantation (HTx) and left ventricular assist device (LVAD).

Performance of risk stratification scores and role of comorbidities in older vs younger patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Risk scores are important tools for the prognostic stratification of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Their performance and the additional impact of comorbidities across age groups is unknown. METHODS: Patients with PAH enrolled from 2001 to 2021 were divided in ≥65 years old vs <65 years old patients. Study outcome was 5-year all-cause mortality. French Pulmonary Hypertension Network (FPHN), FPHN noninvasive, Comparative, Prospective Registry of Newly Initiated Therapies for Pulmonary Hypertension (COMPERA) and Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-term PAH Disease Management (REVEAL 2.0) risk scores were calculated and patients categorized at low, intermediate and high risk. Number of comorbidities was calculated. RESULTS: Among 383 patients, 152 (40%) were ≥65 years old. They had more comorbidities (number of comorbidities 2, IQR 1-3, vs 1, IQR 0-2 in <65 years patients). Five-year survival was 63% in ≥65 vs 90% in <65 years. Risk scores correctly discriminated the different classes of risk in the overall cohort and in the older and younger groups. REVEAL 2.0 showed the best accuracy in the total cohort (C-index 0.74, standard error-SE- 0.03) and older (C-index 0.69, SE 0.03) patients, whereas COMPERA 2.0 performed better in younger patients (C-index 0.75, SE 0.08). Number of comorbidities was associated with higher 5-year mortality, and consistently increased the accuracy of risk scores, in younger but not in older patients. CONCLUSIONS: Risk scores have similar accuracy in the prognostic stratification of older vs younger PAH patients. REVEAL 2.0 had the best performance in older patients and COMPERA 2.0 had it in younger patients. Comorbidities increased the accuracy of risk scores only in younger patients.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated myocarditis: from pathophysiology to rechallenge of therapy - a narrative review.

Even if immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized the landscape of cancer therapy, their use may be complicated by immune-related adverse events. Among these, myocarditis is the most severe complication. The clinical suspicion often arises after clinical symptoms onset and increase in cardiac biomarkers or electrocardiographic manifestations. Echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging are recommended for each patient. However, since they may be misleadingly normal, endomyocardial biopsy remains the gold standard for establishing the diagnosis. Until now, treatment has been based on glucocorticoids even if increasing interest has risen in other immunosuppressive agents. Although myocarditis currently imposes immunotherapy discontinuation, case reports have suggested a safety rechallenge in low-grade myocarditis paving the way for further studies to respond to this unmet clinical need.

Cardiac magnetic resonance abnormalities in patients with acute myocarditis proven by septal endomyocardial biopsy.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies suggest low diagnostic sensitivity of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging based on Lake Louise criteria (LLC) to identify patients with complicated presentations of acute myocarditis (AM). We evaluated classic and updated LLC in patients with AM proven by right ventricular septal endomyocardial biopsy (RVS-EMB). METHODS: From an initial population of 499 patients with clinically suspected AM from a multicenter retrospective cohort, we included 74 patients with histologically proven myocarditis on RVS-EMB and available CMR within 30 days since admission. The prevalence of total and septal CMR abnormalities [namely, T2-weighted images (T2W), late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), T2 and T1 mapping, and extracellular volume (ECV)] were assessed in patients with complicated vs. uncomplicated AM. RESULTS: Among 74 patients [mean age 38 ± 15 years, 65% males, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 40 ± 18%] with RVS-EMB-proven AM, 53 (72%) had a complicated presentation. The classic LLC were positive in 56/74 patients (76%), whereas the updated ones were positive in 41/41 of cases (100%). Septal involvement, documented in 48/74 patients (65%) by conventional T2W/LGE and in 39/41 cases (95%) by mapping techniques (p < 0.001), was more common in patients with complicated AM. In the 41 patients undergoing both evaluations, CMR sensitivity for myocarditis was 85% for the classic LLC vs. 100% for the updated LLC (p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: In patients with myocarditis on RVS-EMB, CMR using updated LLC has high sensitivity in the detection of AM when performed within 30 days. Septal abnormalities are more common in patients with complicated AM.

[Ten questions on cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with heart failure: from etiological diagnosis to prognostic stratification]. / Dieci quesiti in tema di risonanza magnetica cardiaca nel paziente con scompenso cardiaco: dalla diagnosi eziologica alla stratificazione prognostica.

Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging has progressively become part of the imaging methods recommended in patients with heart failure. CMR represents the gold standard for assessing volumes, function, biventricular kinetics and providing tissue characterization through scans with and without contrast medium. In patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy, CMR allows to search for viability, accurately estimate volumes and ejection fraction. It can assess scar extent for predicting response to cardiac resynchronization therapy and for establishing an indication for implanting a defibrillator in borderline cases. In patients with HFrEF and non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy, CMR helps to identify specific etiological subgroups and to estimate the arrhythmic risk beyond ejection fraction. In patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, CMR offers the possibility of diagnosing specific phenotypes, including sarcomeric hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, amyloidosis or Fabry disease, and adds prognostic information. Both clinical and scientific interest in this imaging method is constantly expanding; the clinicians dealing with heart failure cannot fail to know the technique, the indications and all the potential that CMR can offer.

[Heart failure with improved ejection fraction: practical guidance for the clinician]. / Lo scompenso cardiaco con frazione di eiezione migliorata: indicazioni gestionali per il clinico.

Heart failure with improved ejection fraction (HFimpEF) represents a nosological entity that has recently been recognized and has little evidence from the literature. Available data indicate an increasing incidence of this patient group, consistent with the progressive improvement and implementation of medical therapy of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Furthermore, it is important to underline that the therapy itself should not be suspended after ejection fraction recovery, to avoid the recurrence of worse systolic dysfunction and patient outcomes. Only recently a randomized clinical study has been published, which enrolled also this patient subgroup, the DELIVER trial. Other data will soon become available, given the interest of the scientific community for this subgroup of patients, whose best management remains controversial. Since many studies suggest that the probability of myocardial recovery in HFrEF patients might be as high as 40%, depending on the case series taken into account, whereas the time to recovery might even be 12 months, the appropriate timing of device implantation, such as the defibrillator, in this setting deserves careful consideration.

Combined Neuro-Humoral Modulation and Outcomes in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure and Mildly Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction.

Pharmacotherapy of chronic heart failure with mildly reduced (HFmrEF) and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains challenging. We aimed to assess whether combined neuro-humoral modulation (NHM) (renin−angiotensin system inhibitors, betablockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists) was differentially associated with outcome according to phenotype and age groups. Between 1999 and 2018 we recruited in a nationwide cardiology registry 4707 patients (HFmrEF n = 2298, HFpEF n = 2409) from three age groups: <65, 65−79 and 80+ years old. We analyzed clinical characteristics and 1 year all-cause mortality/cardiovascular hospitalization according to none/single, any double, or triple NHM. Prescription rates of no/single and triple NHM were 25.1% and 26.7% for HFmrEF; 36.5% and 17.9% for HFpEF patients, respectively. Older age was associated with higher prescription of no/single NHM in HFmrEF (ptrend = 0.001); the reverse was observed among HFpEF (ptrend = 0.005). Triple NHM increased over time in both phenotypes (all p for trend < 0.0001). Compared to no/single NHM, triple, but not double, NHM was associated with better outcomes in both HFmrEF (HR 0.700, 95%CI 0.505−0.969, p = 0.032) and HFpEF (HR 0.700, 95%CI 0.499−0.983, p = 0.039), with no interaction between NHM treatment and age groups (p = 0.58, p = 0.80, respectively). In a cardiology setting, among HF outpatients with EF > 40%, triple NHM treatment increased over time and was associated with better patient outcomes.